In a significant victory for civil society and protesters, a Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed an application seeking to halt the ongoing #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests.
The application, filed by a group of individuals including Danladi Goje, Buky Abayomi, and Adiza Abbo, sought to enjoin several organizations and individuals involved in the protests from continuing their activities. The plaintiffs argued that the protests posed a threat to their lives, liberty, and property, citing the violence and destruction that occurred during the 2020 #EndSARS protests.
The named defendants in the suit included prominent civil society organizations, activist groups, and individuals such as Omoyele Sowore. The plaintiffs alleged that these entities were responsible for organizing and mobilizing the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests, and that their actions were likely to lead to similar levels of unrest and chaos as witnessed in 2020.
However, Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court dismissed the application, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The judge noted that the recent protests had concluded and there was no imminent threat of renewed demonstrations. Furthermore, the court criticized the plaintiffs for rushing the application without providing adequate supporting documentation.
The decision to deny the injunction is a crucial affirmation of the right to protest, a cornerstone of democratic governance. It underscores the importance of allowing citizens to express their grievances and hold their leaders accountable without fear of reprisal. While the protests have highlighted deep-seated issues in Nigerian society, they have also served as a platform for dialogue and reform.
It is important to note that the court’s decision does not address the underlying grievances that sparked the protests.
The legal battle surrounding the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests is far from over. The plaintiffs have indicated their intention to appeal the court’s decision, suggesting that the issue may continue to be litigated for some time.
